Observational analysis revealed polypharmacy issues in immigrants, suggesting targeted communication interventions could improve adherence.
EP3.3, e-Poster Terminal 3, September 4, 2025, 10:05 - 10:25 Aim With polypharmacy being widespread, mitigating non-adherence is increasingly important, since it can lead to misunderstandings, misdiagnosing, unnecessary and examinations, and exacerbate undesirable polypharmacy. We examined polypharmacy and non-adherence patterns and reasons among a group of immigrant patients at excess risk of experiencing barriers to medicine adherence. Methods Medicine consumption was thoroughly evaluated by a pharmacist during a semi-structured interview. Comparing to the prescriptions in the Shared Medical Record, non-adherence was quantified as the sum of 1) medicine not taken, 2) medicine taken incorrectly, and 3) prescription medicine taken without a prescription. Results A total of 130 patients were included in this study. The average number of prescribed drugs was 8,3. Average total non-adherence of 4,5 drugs per person. No baseline characteristics were significantly associated with non-adherence. Lastly, we analyzed subjective reasons for non-adherence, and found that the reasons economy, misunderstandings, lack of disease understanding, and memory problems were significantly associated with the degree of total non-adherence. Conclusion For our patient group non-adherence is widespread, amounting to non-adherence issues equivalent to > 50% of the number of prescribed drugs. Moreover, we have found that the only significant determinants of non-adherence - apart from the number of prescriptions - are subjective factors, most of which can be alleviated with improved communication interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nørredam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: