Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 1, 2025International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical EngineeringOpen Access

A Comparison of Coupling Strategies for 1D–3D Simulations of Coronary Hemodynamics

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PHPjotr HilhorstEindhoven University of TechnologyAVAmy J.E. VermeerRadboud University NijmegenKZKarol ZającBydgoszcz University of Science and Technology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals steady-state simulations efficiently predict fractional flow reserve in coronary lesions, suggesting benefits of high-fidelity modeling.

Key Points

  • Steady-state simulations significantly reduce computational costs while predicting fractional flow reserve accurately.
  • Key findings indicate effective resolution of coronary hemodynamics in complex stenosis geometries through high-fidelity simulations.
  • Major coupling strategies tested included mean flow-driven steady-state and continuous data exchange transient simulations.
  • High-fidelity simulations underscore the importance of accurate boundary conditions in modeling coronary physiology.

Cite This Study

Hilhorst et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69402a7e2d562116f2902308https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.70126
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding basic vein physiology and venous blood pressure through simple physical assessments2019 · 121 citations
  2. 2Towards Patient-Specific Modeling of Coronary Hemodynamics in Healthy and Diseased State2013 · 31 citations
  3. 3Repeatability of Fractional Flow Reserve Despite Variations in Systemic and Coronary Hemodynamics2015 · 95 citations
  4. 4Influence of Rigid–Elastic Artery Wall of Carotid and Coronary Stenosis on Hemodynamics2022 · 41 citations