Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay reveals defamiliarization's role in Romantic literature, highlighting habit's political implications and aesthetic value.
This essay tells a critical history of Romantic defamiliarization as informed by 1790s debates over the moral and political value of habit and custom. I argue that William Godwin’s conversion of the links and chains of empiricist association into instruments of political bondage paves the way for a radical Romantic interpretation of defamiliarization as liberatory. By contrast I show that Edmund Burke, counter to his earlier assertion of habit’s aesthetic impoverishment, seeks to bolster his social defense of custom by giving it aesthetic heft. Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s later attempts to balance novelty and familiarity inherit the philosophical difficulties of both camps, complicating familiarity’s contested place in Romantic literature and theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beatrice Sanford Russell (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: