Observational analysis demonstrates prognostic correlation of ABVD with OS and PFS in Hodgkin lymphoma.
Purpose The prognostic value of radiomic quantitative features measured on pretreatment 18 F‐FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with advanced‐stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 176 HL patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2017. A dozen of PET/CT‐derived features were extracted via Oncometer3D from baseline 18 F‐FDG PET/CT images. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox analyses were used to assess the prognostic factors for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression‐Free Survival (PFS) censored at 5 years. Results Four different clusters were identified among the 12 PET parameters analyzed: activity, tumor burden, fragmentation‐massiveness, and dispersion. On ROC analyses, medEdgeD, a massiveness parameter, had the highest AUC for OS (0.72) and PFS (0.6). Patients with high baseline medEdgeD had a significantly worse PFS ( p = 0.04) and OS ( p = 0.003) in both Kaplan–Meier and Cox univariate analyses. Furthermore, medEdgeD remained statistically significant in a multivariate analysis ( p = 0.008 for OS and p = 0.014 for PFS) including various TEP and clinical parameters used in daily routine. In addition, in sub‐group analyses, a significantly worse prognosis was observed for patients with ABVD and with high baseline medEdgeD value ( p = 0.0082 for OS and p = 0.001 for PFS). Moreover, in the bulky subgroup, medEdgeD improved prognostic accuracy ( p = 0.016). Conclusion PET parameters describing massiveness, in particular medEdgeD, are significantly correlated with prognosis in HL patients for OS and PFS, especially when treated with ABVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Draye-Carbonnier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: