Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Grafting is a strategy to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses in coffee systems. However, initial compatibility indicators between Coffea arabica scions and C. canephora rootstocks under controlled conditions remain insufficiently documented. We evaluated the physiological and morphological compatibility of four C. arabica cultivars (Bourbon, Geisha, Catuai, and Villa Sarchí) grafted onto C. canephora (Robusta) rootstock in a tropical highland nursery in the Peruvian Amazon. Seven physiological and six morphological variables were measured. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons. Two physiological parameters were significantly higher in Villa Sarchí grafts than in Robusta: PSII quantum yield (+0.044 units; p < 0.05) and electron transport rate (+14.702 µmol e− m−2 s−1; p < 0.05); by contrast, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, and transpiration did not differ, and maximum PSII efficiency was similar among treatments (p = 0.509). Conversely, no morphological trait showed significant differences, and graft-take was high across all combinations. The results support the use of Coffea robusta as a rootstock for these four cultivated varieties, thereby offering the possibility of improving their resilience in tropical highland regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Condori‐Apfata et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: