In the field of enhanced oil recovery in low-permeability reservoirs, the application of nanomaterials has attracted widespread attention. However, conventional nanomaterials exhibit issues such as large particle size and poor dispersion stability. This study selected SiO2 nanoparticles with a particle size of 10 nm and combined them with 12 types of commonly used oilfield surfactants. After aging at 120 °C for 48 h, using dispersion stability and interfacial tension (IFT) as evaluation criteria, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was ultimately identified as the optimal modifier. The structure and morphology of the SiO2 particles were characterized in detail using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The system evaluated the dispersion stability of nanofluids before and after modification, as well as the interfacial properties (IFT reduced to the 10−1 mN/m range) and wettability (oil-wet surfaces reversed to strongly water-wet, with contact angles decreasing to 30°) of nanofluids with different modification degrees. Considering economic factors, the modified nano-SiO2 system with a ratio of 1:0.5 was selected. Microvisualization experiments revealed that the modified nanoscale system achieves residual oil displacement through three mechanisms: emulsification (reducing residual oil droplet size to enhance mobility), wetting reversal (lowering contact angle to weaken adhesion), and structural separation pressure (counteracting capillary forces to destabilize residual oil). Displacement experiments reveal that in rock cores with permeability ranging from 1 to 100 mD, the modified system exhibits a recovery rate trend that initially increases and then decreases. Nevertheless, it consistently enhances recovery rates, maintaining them above 12%, demonstrating strong application potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: