Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS)-based remote sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) analysis enable real-time wildfire or bushfire detection, facilitating early response to minimize damage and protect lives and property. However, their effectiveness is limited by three issues: distinguishing smoke from fog, the high cost of manual annotation, and the computational demands of large models. This study addresses the three key challenges by introducing plume as a new indicator to better distinguish smoke from similar visual elements, and by employing a hybrid annotation method using knowledge distillation (KD) to reduce expert labour and accelerate labelling. Additionally, it leverages lightweight YOLO Nano models trained with pseudo-labels generated from a fine-tuned teacher network to lower computational demands while maintaining high detection accuracy for real-time wildfire monitoring. Controlled pile burns in Canungra, QLD, Australia, were conducted to collect UAS-captured images over deciduous vegetation, which were subsequently augmented with the Flame2 dataset, which contains wildfire images of coniferous vegetation. A Grounding DINO model, fine-tuned using few-shot learning, served as the teacher network to generate pseudo-labels for a significant portion of the Flame2 dataset. These pseudo-labels were then used to train student networks consisting of YOLO Nano architectures, specifically versions 5, 8, and 11 (YOLOv5n, YOLOv8n, YOLOv11n). The experimental results show that YOLOv8n and YOLOv5n achieved an mAP@0.5 of 0.721. Plume detection outperforms smoke indicators (F1: 76.1–85.7% vs. 70%) in fog and wildfire scenarios. These findings underscore the value of incorporating plume as a distinct class and utilizing KD, both of which enhance detection accuracy and scalability, ultimately supporting more reliable and timelier wildfire monitoring and response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pirunthan Keerthinathan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: