Remote sensing (RS) has evolved from occasional mapping to continuous, indicator-based monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This review synthesizes four decades of global progress in RS to characterize natural and semi-natural ecosystems, examining how study purposes, sensor types and analytical methods have diversified from 1985 to 2025. A systematic literature review of 6856 publications (1567 selected) documents the transition from expert-based visual interpretation using aerial photography and early Landsat missions, to harmonized, AI-driven workflows that enable scalable and replicable ecosystem assessments. Advances in cloud computing, data cubes and open-access archives now allow wall-to-wall time series of analyses across regions and biomes. Yet, important challenges persist, including the underrepresentation of biodiversity-rich areas, limited in-situ calibration data and uncertainties related to phenological variability, image correction or temporal mosaicking pipelines. Building on case studies from a global perspective, we outline design principles for policy-ready ecosystem indicators traceable to raw observations, comparable through time and space, and aligned with biodiversity policy frameworks. Integrating multi-sensor data (optical, radar, LiDAR, thermal), standardized in-situ observations and artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms, RS provides a robust pathway towards operational ecosystem accounting and large-scale functional mapping and monitoring, strengthening conservation planning and ecosystem management worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvarez‐Martínez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: