Preclinical study demonstrates potent cytotoxicity and oxidative stress in cancer cell lines, highlighting 5-fluorouracil platinum(IV) prodrugs as viable candidates.
Six platinum(IV) prodrugs incorporating 5-fluorouracil (5FU) derivatives in the axial positions were synthesised, purified, fully characterised, and their biological activity assessed. The 5FU derivatives, 5FU-acetate and 5FU-methoxybutanoate, were successfully coordinated to [Pt(PL)(1S,2S-diaminocyclohexane)(OH)₂]²⁺ scaffolds, where PL = 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen) or 5,6-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (56Me₂Phen). All complexes exhibited exceptional in vitro cytotoxicity across a broad panel of cancer cell lines, with [PtIV(56Me₂Phen)(1S,2S-diaminocyclohexane)(5FU-methoxybutanoate)(OH)](NO₃)₂ (6) demonstrating the lowest GI₅₀ of 1 nM against the prostate Du145 cancer cell line. Each complex displayed significantly enhanced activity compared to cisplatin, with 6 being up to 1400-fold more active in selected cancer cell lines. Complexes incorporating the 5FU-methoxybutanoate ligand (5 and 6) were notably more cytotoxic and lipophilic than their 5FU-acetate analogues (1-3), with 6 also exhibiting ∼2-fold greater potency than its platinum(II) precursor. Further studies in the HT29 colon cancer cell line revealed that 5 and 6 induced sustained elevations in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and substantial reductions in mitochondrial membrane potential, indicating that oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contributed to their cytotoxicity. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the incorporation of 5FU into platinum(IV) prodrugs enhances both potency and mechanistic activity, with prodrug 6 emerging as a highly promising anticancer candidate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakoff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: