We address the underexplored role of visual feedback in ensuring stability of pressing force produced in isometric conditions by the two hands. We considered the task as a two-level hierarchy (total force, F TOT , and hand forces, F HAND ) and used the framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis to quantify synergies stabilizing F TOT and F HAND . Young healthy persons performed steady-state forces with visual feedback and targets for the forces produced by each hand and/or for the total force. We quantified inter-trial and within-a-trial (across time windows) variance components affecting and not affecting F TOT and F HAND . Variables with visual feedback, F TOT or F HAND , showed force-stabilizing synergies reflected in the structure of variance, while variables without visual feedback failed to show such synergies. The synergies were consistently stronger when the feedback was continuous, compared to when the feedback disappeared when the cursor was inside the target. The results showed a strong dependence between variance that did not affect F TOT (within the corresponding solution space) and variance that affected each F HAND across the feedback conditions. Within-a-trial synergy indices were significantly lower than those in the inter-trial analysis. The data are interpreted as reflecting hierarchical control with synergies at both levels of the hierarchy, those that define F TOT and F HAND . These synergies get contributions from inter-trial force sharing variability and sensory feedback-based covariation of forces produced by the elements (fingers or hands) along individual trials. Combining inter-trial and within-a-trial analysis of variance may provide an important toolbox to explore cases of impaired control of action stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
De et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: