Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), function as pivotal immune checkpoints. Numerous studies have demonstrated the association between the malignant progression of various swine diseases and aberrant expression of PD-1 and PD-L1, hence the development and screening of high-affinity porcine PD-1 and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) holds substantial significance for advancing research and therapeutic interventions. In this study, we produced porcine PD-1 and PD-L1 mAbs which exhibited robust reactivity in western blot (WB), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and flow cytometry (FCM). The newly identified B-cell epitope 90 GRDPRFHVTPL 100 and 185 REEKLFNVTST 195 of PD-1 and PD-L1 mAbs were linear and surface-exposed as illustrated by WB and structure analysis. Comparative sequence analysis demonstrated that the PD-L1 epitope is highly conserved across species, whereas the PD-1 epitope exhibits lower interspecies conservation. In addition, the blocking efficacy of the two PD-1 mAbs and six PD-L1 mAbs was predicted low via molecular docking. To further evaluate the blocking efficacy, we generated a flow cytometry-based assay by using a porcine PD-L1-rabbit Fc fusion protein, expressed via a eukaryotic system. In agreement with the prediction, our in vitro data demonstrated a blocking rate below 4% compared with the IgG group for PD-1 mAbs and PD-L1 mAbs. In summary, we herein generated porcine PD-1 and PD-L1 mAbs recognizing unreported B-cell epitopes, and established a reliable method for identifying the nonblocking mAb and epitopes, which may facilitate the development of novel diagnostic approaches and therapeutic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: