This study presents a cross-sectoral Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) for the Azores archipelago, a remote mid-North Atlantic oceanic region. It identifies the diversity, interconnectedness, and implications of anthropogenic pressures on marine ecosystems, serving as a versatile tool to assess impact risk and ecosystem vulnerability. Drawing on a comprehensive literature review, expert judgment, and stakeholder engagement, the IEA evaluated 12 economic sectors, 16 pressures, and 28 ecological components across the nearly 1 million km2 Azores Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).The sectoral analysis revealed that fishing, tourism, and shipping collectively account for over 86 % of the cumulative impact risk in the Azores EEZ. Among the various pressures, species extraction, bycatch, contaminants, invasive species, and marine litter alone contribute to 95 % of the total impact risk on the region’s marine environment. Although coastal ecosystems represent less than 1 % of the EEZ, they bear more than 50 % of the total impact risk—primarily affecting demersal fishes, elasmobranchs, and shallow/littoral rocky and reef habitats. Other highly vulnerable components include pelagic and deep-sea elasmobranchs, marine mammals, and seabirds.The study also underscores critical knowledge gaps, with 50 % of impact chains relying on global data due to a lack of region-specific evidence—particularly in deep-sea and abyssal ecosystems. This IEA provides essential insights for Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM), aligning regional monitoring priorities with the requirements of EU marine conservation and spatial planning directives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: