Background Work-related hand eczema (WRHE) is a common occupational disease in Europe, associated with impaired quality of life and a substantial socioeconomic burden. As skin protection behaviour critically influences disease course, mobile health interventions may help establish and maintain routines. The smartphone app ‘ Mein Hautschutz im Alltag ’ (MiA; German for ‘ My Skin Protection in Everyday Life ’) was developed to support patients with WRHE, but its clinical effectiveness has not yet been evaluated. Methods This quasi-randomised controlled trial will enrol 286 adults with WRHE attending a 3-week inpatient programme at a specialised dermatology clinic. Participants are allocated in clusters based on admission date to either care as usual (control) or care as usual plus an individual goal-setting interview and a 6-month access to the MiA app (intervention). The primary outcome is change in skin protection behaviour from baseline to 6 months post-discharge. Secondary outcomes include clinical and self-rated skin condition, action control, and quality of life. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models. Discussion This is the first systematic evaluation of the MiA app’s effectiveness in patients with WRHE in a quasi-randomised controlled trial. By combining a structured goal-setting interview with the MiA app, the intervention aims to support the long-term adoption and maintenance of protective behaviours in both occupational and private settings. Key limitations include the quasi-random allocation by admission date (no true randomisation), lack of allocation concealment and blinding, reliance on self-reported primary outcomes, and a 6-month follow-up. Despite these constraints, the pragmatic design aims to generate decision-relevant, real-world evidence for WRHE care. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Registry DRKS00036627. Registered on April 14, 2025.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocholl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: