PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 26, 2025Journal of Surgical Oncology2 citations

Oncological Outcomes of Omitting Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
RAReem AlthawadiRERaja EidHAHussain Adnan Abdulla

Key Points

  • Omitting axillary surgery increases the risk of axillary recurrence (RR 3.82, 95% CI 1.48–9.82) without significantly altering overall survival or disease-free survival rates.
  • Meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method pooled outcomes across five studies involving 8108 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer.
  • Axillary surgery may be safely omitted in selected older patients with favourable tumour biology, provided multidisciplinary teams guide adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic care.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of omitting axillary surgery for patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS). However, there is concern that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is necessary to inform adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy decisions. The aim was to assess the oncological and survival outcomes of omitting surgical axillary staging in early breast cancer. Methods A systematic literature search of relevant databases was performed. Eligible studies compared omission of axillary surgery with conventional axillary staging. A meta‐analysis using the Mantel‐Haenszel method was performed to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) for axillary recurrence (AR), disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for omission of axillary surgery compared with conventional axillary surgery. Results Five studies involving 8108 patients were included. Omission of axillary surgery was associated with a higher risk of AR (RR 3.82 95% CI 1.48–9.82, p < 0.005). No significant differences were observed in in DFS (RR 1.09 95% CI 0.91–1.30, p = 0.33) or OS (RR 1.06 95% CI 0.72–1.55; p = 0.78). Conclusions Axillary surgery may be safely omitted in a highly select group of older patients with favourable tumour biology undergoing BCS. Multidisciplinary team input remains essential to appropriately select adjuvant treatments when nodal staging is omitted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Althawadi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694035e12d562116f2908896https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70145
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Randomized Trial Comparing Axillary Clearance Versus No Axillary Clearance in Older Patients With Breast Cancer: First Results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-932005 · 410 citations
  2. 2Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial2010 · 1,946 citations
  3. 3Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer2018 · 2,430 citations
  4. 4A Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Additional Nodal Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients With a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy2003 · 823 citations
  5. 5Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation2002 · 1,403 citations