Background Respiratory tract infections represent a significant global health challenge. Conventional diagnostic methods frequently fail to detect complex infections or novel pathogens. This study employed Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing to achieve an unbiased and comprehensive identification of respiratory pathogens, as well as to conduct analysis of pathogen distribution across age, gender and seasons. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical samples, including throat swabs, sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, obtained from symptomatic patients. The analysis utilized targeted next-generation sequencing in conjunction with bioinformatics. Statistical assessments were performed to evaluate associations with age, gender, season, and co-infections, primarily employing Chi-square tests. Results A high pathogen detection rate of 97.08% was achieved among 20059 individuals. Bacteria were the most frequently detected pathogens, accounting for 49.62%, followed by viruses at 43.31%, and special pathogens at 7.07%. Significant age-related differences in pathogen profiles were observed. Although no overall gender effect was detected, variations specific to certain pathogens were noted. Clear seasonal trends emerged for key pathogens. Co-infections were highly prevalent, with bacterial-viral combinations being the most common, affecting 49.03% of patients, which exceeded the rate of bacterial infections alone at 15.69%. Conclusion Targeted next-generation sequencing serves as a robust tool for elucidating the intricate spectrum and epidemiology of respiratory pathogens. This study underscores significant associations with patient age, seasonal variations, and the prevalence of co-infections, providing essential insights for targeted clinical and public health interventions in response to respiratory tract infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: