In the context of civic education, teaching map-based argumentation skills is essential to enable learners to participate in finding solutions to social challenges. Based on the assumption that teachers’ beliefs have a significant influence on lesson design and thus on students’ learning success, a study was conducted to investigate the beliefs of geography teachers regarding their conceptual understanding of map-based argumentation. An analysis of the interviews made it possible to categorize various conceptual understandings and showed that the majority of geography teachers have a rudimentary understanding of the concept or one that deviates from the didactic understanding of the concept. As a result, the teachers ascribe insufficient importance to map-based argumentation skills. In conclusion, the resulting consequences for teaching practice were discussed, and starting points for optimizing the implementation of the concept were identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunze et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: