Cohort study reveals variable recovery in infants with non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia, highlighting the need for individualized immunologic management.
Background Newborn screening (NBS) by quantification of T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) identifies a considerable number of infants with T-cell lymphopenia (TCL) other than severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). While some of these children have well-defined inborn errors of immunity (IEI), many lack a clear genetic diagnosis, complicating their management and causing prognostic uncertainty. Objective To characterize the natural history of non-SCID TCL detected through NBS in Swiss infants between 2019 and 2023. Methods Clinical, genetic and laboratory data from all non-SCID TCL cases were extracted from the national NBS registry and analyzed. Results Out of 435 985 screened infants, 42 patients were identified with non-SCID, non-congenital athymia TCL, without an obvious secondary cause. A clear genetic diagnosis of IEI was established in 20 (48%) patients. Infants with confirmed IEI had significantly lower total T-cell, CD4 + T-cell and recent thymic emigrant (RTE) counts on initial lymphocyte phenotyping. In contrast, those with an unclear genetic diagnosis despite full investigations demonstrated faster normalization of total T-cell counts (hazard ratio 5.2, 95% CI 1.9 to 14.5, p = 0.001). All infants with initial CD4 + T-cell < 0.3 × 10 9 /L showed minimal recovery of T-cell counts and remained on long-term prophylactic measures. All infants with an unclear genetic diagnosis despite investigations were able to discontinue prophylaxis at median age 6 months without experiencing opportunistic or severe infections. Conclusion Infants with non-SCID TCL identified by NBS represent a heterogenous group, ranging from severe, persistent TCL to mild, transient lymphopenia. Management should be tailored based on individual immunological and genetic profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soomann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: