Aim This study investigates the relationship between religiosity and self-rated health, examining the potential health benefits of religion/religious practices at both the individual and societal levels within a European context. Subject and methods Data from the European Social Survey (ESS) were analysed using a logistic multilevel model ( N = 31,943). Religiosity (independent variable) was assessed with a set of indicators that incorporated the degree of religiosity, frequency of prayer, and religious affiliation. General health (dependent variable) was measured through self-rated health status. The model also included the cross-level variables Social Hostility Index (SHI) and the national denominational share (% of population reporting a denomination). Results Prayer was positively associated with higher odds of very good/good health (odds ratio [OR] = 1.185, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.097–1.281, p < 0.001), whereas the degree of religiosity showed no significant association (OR = 0.970, 95% CI [0.913–1.030], p = 0.325). Religious minorities had lower odds (OR = 0.719, 95% CI [0.581–0.889], p = 0.002) of very good/good health. Contextual variables (SHI and national denominational share) were not significant. The interaction between denomination and SHI was significant only for Protestants (OR = 1.098, 95% CI [1.019–1.184], p = 0.014). Estimates were controlled for education, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol use, fruit/vegetable consumption, and sport activity. Conclusion Prayer shows a positive association with health, but overall religiosity remains complex and inconclusive in this cross-sectional study. To clarify the religion–health relationship, studies across diverse contexts, both longitudinal and cross-sectional, are needed; these should focus on religious minorities and test additional mechanisms and moderators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heise et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: