Background: Understanding how heme proteins and heme induce AKI is clinically relevant from numerous perspectives, and, in this regard, a widely used model of heme protein-mediated (HP-AKI) involves the glycerol model in mice. Using this model, we have previously demonstrated that NAD + content is decreased in HP-AKI. As there is significant current interest in NAD + -boosting as a strategy in clinical AKI, we examined the effect of NAD + -boosting in this model. Methods: NAD + -boosting was achieved by the administration of nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) in the glycerol model of HP-AKI. The effect of NMN, compared with vehicle, was examined in mice with HP-AKI and with sham AKI at day 1 after HP-AKI was induced. Results: The administration of NMN preserved kidney NAD + content in HP-AKI and, compared with the administration of vehicle in HP-AKI, NMN improved glomerular filtration markers; reduced histologic injury as assessed by tubular necrosis, dilation, and cast formation and by assessment of dystrophic calcification; reduced expression of KIM1, a sensitive marker of AKI; preserved mitochondrial ultrastructure and increased expression of proteins that promote mitochondrial integrity; reduced apoptosis as assessed by TUNEL staining and genes and protein expression that contribute to apoptosis, while increasing expression of an anti-apoptotic gene; reduced expression of several renal injury-related genes; and mitigated the severity of the senescence phenotype, as assessed by multiple markers. Finally, the administration of myoglobin or heme in vivo diminished kidney NAD + content in mice with intact kidneys. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the remarkable protective effects of NAD + -boosting by NMN in HP-AKI as revealed by a multitude of markers relevant to AKI. The reduction in NAD + content in the kidney in HP-AKI may reflect the direct effects of heme proteins and/or heme. We suggest that these findings support current interest in NAD + -boosting as a therapeutic strategy in clinical AKI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: