Key result
Nicotinamide riboside improves post-MI renal function and reduces cell death without improving ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Does Nicotinamide Riboside improve cardiac ejection fraction and kidney function in a mouse model of MI-induced acute kidney injury?
Does Nicotinamide Riboside improve cardiac ejection fraction and kidney function in a mouse model of MI-induced acute kidney injury?
Nicotinamide riboside demonstrates potential as a therapy for MI-induced acute kidney injury (Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome) by protecting renal function via NAD upregulation, despite lacking direct cardiac benefits.
BACKGROUND: , takes place in the heart after MI, but the impact on kidney NAD metabolism and function has not been addressed before. METHODS AND RESULTS: MI was induced by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery in 2-month-old C57BL6/J mice, followed by the administration of NR (IP injection, 400 mg/kg per day) for 4 and 7 days. We hypothesized that NR treatment could be a potentially promising therapy for MI-induced acute kidney injury. Our findings showed no significant improvement in cardiac ejection fraction following NR treatment at days 4 and 7 post-MI, whereas kidney functions were enhanced and morphological alterations and cell death decreased. The observed renal protection seems to be mediated by an upregulation of NAMPT-mediated increase in renal NAD levels, notably in the distal tubules. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that NR could potentially be a promising therapy for acute kidney injury following an early stage of MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habeichi et al. (2025) studied Myocardial Infarction-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) was evaluated on Cardiac ejection fraction, kidney functions, morphological alterations, and cell death. Nicotinamide Riboside administration (400 mg/kg/day) post-MI in mice enhanced kidney functions and decreased cell death, despite no significant improvement in cardiac ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: