The absence of a universally optimal global explanation technique for machine learning models presents a significant challenge in ensuring interpretability across diverse tasks and domains. Existing methods vary in their strengths and limitations, and selecting the most suitable technique often requires manual trial-and-error, which is inefficient and prone to bias. This study introduces AutoXAI, a meta-learning framework designed to automate the recommendation of global explanation techniques for supervised learning tasks on tabular data. The framework aims to optimize interpretability by aligning recommendations with user-defined quantitative metrics. AutoXAI leverages optimal transport tos identify datasets with similar underlying distributions and applies multi-objective optimization to select explanation methods that best satisfy the chosen metrics. The framework currently supports four widely adopted model-agnostic techniques: LIME, Anchor, RuleFit, and RuleMatrix. AutoXAI was evaluated across 21 benchmark datasets, where its recommendations matched the best-performing explanation techniques in 19 cases. Comparative analysis against static heuristics demonstrated superior performance. Robustness experiments showed that AutoXAI maintained consistent recommendations under noise perturbations in over 90% of scenarios, confirming its reliability. AutoXAI offers a scalable, data-driven solution for selecting explanation techniques, reducing manual effort and enhancing trust in model decisions. Its adaptability to user preferences and resilience to noise make it a promising tool for real-world deployment, including critical domains such as healthcare and intrusion detection systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shawi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: