A novel procedure, proposed by Kujawski and Vasudevan 1 , has been evaluated as an alternative to the ASTM E647 standard for determining the ∆K th and K max,th thresholds. This method relies solely on the actual propagation of cracks, which occurs only when both thresholds are satisfied simultaneously. For long cracks, a more efficient estimation of thresholds can be achieved. Compared to the ASTM E647 standard (R = 0.1, ∆K th = 2.95 MPa√m), the new methodology for the same R yielded a value of ∆K th = 2.50 MPa√m and determined a maximum stress threshold of K max,th = 3.35 MPa√m. A correlated parameter, K* = K max α ·∆K 1‐α , α = 0.5 for Al 2024 T3 alloy, was employed to provide an effective relation between the loading ratio and the threshold conditions, with K* values ranging from 2.8 to 3 MPa√m for R‐ratios from 0.1 to 0.7. The implementation of this technique has the potential to reduce testing time and postprocessing efforts by minimizing the need for crack propagation calculations. This method provides valuable insights into the material behavior near the fatigue threshold for the specific cases and material investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerezo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: