Background Family planning is a crucial aspect of reproductive health, influenced by socio-cultural and personal beliefs. Partner support and communication play key roles in shaping contraceptive preferences and decision-making. This study explores the critical role partner support and effective communication play in shaping women’s preferences for family planning methods within a Nigerian healthcare context. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used, including a cross-sectional survey of 260 women aged 15–49 selected through systematic random sampling, and in-depth interviews with 20 participants selected via purposive sampling between July and December 2024. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23, with chi-square tests determining associations. The level of significance was set at p < 0.050. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results The study examined partner support and communication influence on family planning preferences using a mixed-methods approach. Among 260 participants, 90.8% were married, 68.1% had tertiary education, and 75.4% used contraceptives; implants (55, 28.1%) and IUCDs (44, 22.4%) were most preferred. Partner support was significant with 55.8% of participants reporting good support, especially among married women and formally employed individuals. Communication was crucial, with 48.1% of those with good communication experience reporting good partner support (p < 0.001). Barriers included cultural expectations and financial constraints, while economic considerations and shared family goals facilitated use, with 96.5% engaging healthcare providers. Conclusion Strengthening partner support and communication through community-based education and healthcare initiatives, particularly involving men, is essential for improving family planning outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayowole et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: