Objective The goal of this research was to explore how the family of origin influences the working experiences of female micro‐entrepreneurs across different life stages in Chile. Background While intergenerational research has extensively examined the role of the family of origin, there is limited understanding of its specific impact on the occupational experiences of female micro‐entrepreneurs. Family dynamics, caregiving responsibilities, and gender norms often play crucial roles in shaping these experiences, particularly in the context of Latin America, where extended family arrangements and single motherhood are common. Method This study employs an exploratory qualitative approach, using life‐story interviews with 15 female micro‐entrepreneurs aged 28 to 54 years from Santiago, Chile. The interviews focus on their employment history, motivations for entrepreneurship, and the influence of family dynamics on their working life. Results The findings indicate that the family of origin can condition, facilitate, or hinder the working experiences of female micro‐entrepreneurs. Key themes include financial support, caregiving responsibilities, and conflicting gender expectations. Although family support is often essential, it can also generate conflict and create barriers to professional growth, particularly in relation to caregiving and social expectations. Conclusion The family of origin plays a dual role in the working experiences of female micro‐entrepreneurs in Chile, providing both support and challenges. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing policies that address the unique needs of this vulnerable population. Implications The study advocates for policies that recognize the specific challenges faced by female micro‐entrepreneurs, particularly regarding caregiving responsibilities and the need for financial support. Support mechanisms that acknowledge the role of family in these women's professional lives can enhance their entrepreneurial success and overall well‐being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inostroza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: