Federated learning for speech emotion recognition faces fundamental challenges in simultaneously achieving high performance, privacy preservation, and model interpretability. This paper introduces FedSER-XAI, a novel framework that integrates Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-based feature selection, multi-stream cross-attention mechanisms, and graph-based feature extraction within an explainable federated learning architecture. Our approach combines Vision Transformer processing of mel-spectrograms with temporal-spatial graph convolutional networks to capture both contextual and structural speech relationships. The PSO algorithm achieves 78.1% dimensionality reduction (228→50 features) while improving discriminative power. The multi-stream architecture processes traditional acoustic features alongside novel graph-based representations derived from visibility and correlation graphs, fused through Transformer-based cross-attention mechanisms. Extensive evaluation on EMODB and SAVEE datasets demonstrates exceptional performance: 99.9% and 97.2% accuracy in centralized settings, with remarkable federated performance achieving global model accuracies of 99.7% (EMODB) and 97.2% (SAVEE) across 8 emotion-specialized clients, representing only 0.2% and 0.0% degradation compared to centralized training. The framework achieves rapid convergence within 10 communication rounds, representing minimal performance degradation (0.2% for EMODB) while preserving privacy. Cross-dataset evaluation on CREMA-D yields 68% accuracy, demonstrating reasonable generalization. The comprehensive explainability framework using SHAP and LIME provides global and local interpretations, validating that graph-based features contribute significantly to emotion discrimination. FedSER-XAI represents the first explainable federated speech emotion recognition system, advancing trustworthy AI for sensitive healthcare and human-computer interaction applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkhamali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: