Purpose Previous studies suggested that arterial‐input‐function (AIF) images are necessary to avoid signal saturation for pulmonary transit time (PTT) measurements. This study challenges that notion by investigating whether PTT can be accurately measured using blood pool signals from myocardial enhancement (non‐AIF) images during resting first‐pass perfusion MRI. Methods This retrospective study included 108 patients, 47 scanned using a research radial perfusion sequence, and 61 scanned with a prototype Cartesian quantitative perfusion (qPerf) sequence with inline PTT calculation. An automated pipeline was developed to compute PTT measurements from blood pool signals extracted from both AIF and non‐AIF images, as well as from gadolinium concentration curves of the AIF images, using three methods: peak‐to‐peak timing, area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) derived centroids, and curve‐fitting derived centroids. Results Peak‐to‐peak PTT showed low bias (0.10–0.56 s; [1.4%–7.4%] of the mean), wide limits of agreement (5.71–7.42 s; [74.5%–109.8%]). In contrast, centroid‐based methods, using both AUC and curve‐fitting approaches, consistently yielded low bias (< 0.49 s; < 6.3%), narrower limits of agreement (1.83–2.84 s; 25.2%–36.8%). These findings indicate that centroid methods offer more precise and reliable PTT estimation across both radial perfusion and qPerf datasets. Conclusions PTT can be derived accurately from non‐AIF images using either the AUC or curve‐fitting centroid‐to‐centroid method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: