Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pore systems in continental shales are controlled by lithofacies and show strong heterogeneity, which challenges shale oil development. The Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin is a major shale oil play in China. Previous studies have focused on macroscopic reservoir properties, with limited analysis of pore differences among lithofacies. This study integrates mineralogy, organic geochemistry, and multi-scale pore structure characterization to examine four typical lithofacies: argillaceous, siliceous, calcareous, and mixed shales. Results show that pore evolution in the Qingshankou Formation can be divided into five stages: immature (Ro < 0.6%), low maturity (0.6% < Ro ≤ 0.8%), middle maturity (0.8% < Ro ≤ 1.0%), high maturity (1.0% < Ro ≤ 1.2%), and over maturity (Ro > 1.2%). The overall pattern follows a “three declines and two increases” trend. Due to differences in mineral composition and organic matter (OM), each lithofacies displays dis-tinct pore characteristics, which further influence oil-bearing potential and mobility. Siliceous shale, rich in felsic minerals, exhibits well-preserved pores and a developed micro-fracture network, providing the largest pore volume and average diameter. This facilitates the storage and flow of free oil, making it the preferred exploration target. Argillaceous shale, characterized by abundant clay minerals and OM, supports micropore development and offers the highest specific surface area (SSA). This yields significant adsorbed oil potential, highlighting its value as a secondary exploration target. This study clarifies the lithofacial controls on pore development in continental shales, providing a scientific basis for predicting favorable intervals and optimizing exploration strategies in the Qingshankou Formation and analogous basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: