Analysis reveals shifts in phylogenetic topologies of amniotes, suggesting taxon sampling impacts evolutionary interpretations.
The dichotomy within Amniota (mammals and reptiles) was recognized early in the history of phylogenetic systematics, and with it developed a canonical understanding of the evolutionary relationships of early-diverging clades. In recent years, the relationships of these clades have shifted dramatically among studies, which has profound effects on how researchers interpret evolutionary patterns in early amniotes. To gain a fuller understanding of the early evolution of amniotes, we compiled one of the largest amniote-wide phylogenetic datasets, including 590 fully illustrated characters and 150 taxa representing all the major clades of “pelycosaurian” stem mammals, pan-reptiles, and several outgroups. We analyzed this dataset under Bayesian and Parsimony frameworks, which resulted in different topologies, particularly among stem mammals and near-crown and within-crown Reptilia. To explore the effect sampling has on tree topology, we conducted three series of exclusion experiments, each consisting of ten analyses, each with ten fewer OTUs than the previous, as well as 26 exclusion analyses removing one major clade of early diverging amniote or individual OTU at a time. This experiment showed that taxon sampling has a major effect on early amniote tree topology, and many of the topologies we found bear striking similarities to those reported in recent publications. Furthermore, we identify and discuss several unique effects that taxon exclusion may have on phylogenies. To address poorly resolved (i.e., polytomies) and unstable portions of amniote phylogeny, where branches frequently move or dismantle depending on sampling and choice of analytical technique, we encourage more detailed anatomical work on early amniotes, particularly stem mammals, and expansion of morphological phylogenetic datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: