Review article uncovers systemic biases against Libyan universities in global rankings, suggesting strategies to improve performance.
Most Libyan universities are ranked very low—or are entirely absent—from international university rankings. This review article explores the multifaceted causes of this disappointing status along two main lines: systemic biases inherent in most international ranking frameworks and major internal challenges within the Libyan higher education system. We demonstrate how international ranking criteria tend to favor well-established Western institutions while disadvantaging counterparts in developing nations. At the same time, the article highlights specific internal issues within Libyan higher education that hinder performance and limit international competitiveness. There is, in fact, a continuous and synergistic interaction between these external biases and internal deficiencies, which together exacerbate the poor global standing of Libyan universities. Ultimately, the article concludes with a mission-level set of specific recommendations aimed at helping policymakers and university administrators implement strategic improvements to strengthen the core competencies of Libyan universities and, consequently, enhance their global rankings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glessa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: