The analysis reveals the impact of organized crime networks on governance, highlighting effective measures for repression and international cooperation.
The consolidation of narco-states can be understood through the intersection of weak rule of law, systemic corruption, and the strengthening of organized crime networks. Institutional capture and territorial governance—manifested through practices such as extortion, drug trafficking, and money laundering—demonstrate the power of these organizations, which are capable of undermining state sovereignty and democratic functionality. In Latin America, certain countries reveal a dynamic interplay between transnational organized crime and the political sphere, particularly through corruption that permeates individuals as well as public and private institutions, enabling the establishment of parallel powers. In this context, the rule of law is a central element for safeguarding society and the democratic order. Confronting organized crime requires integrated actions of repression, prevention, and governance strengthening, with a multidimensional approach that underscores the importance of international cooperation in the face of transnational challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinicius Alencar Moretto (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: