Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 19, 2025World Journal of Meta-AnalysisOpen Access

Pulsed field vs cryoballoon ablation: A meta-analysis with Hartung–Knapp, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MKMirza Muhammad Hadeed KhawarSOSanjar OdilovUMUmer Farooque Memon

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Meta-analysis reveals pulsed field ablation improves arrhythmia-free survival in atrial fibrillation, suggesting effectiveness over cryoballoon ablation.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of pulsed field ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing PFA and CBA.
  • Searched multiple databases for studies up to August 2025.
  • Calculated pooled mean differences and odds ratios using random-effects models.
  • PFA significantly reduced procedure time by approximately 15.24 minutes.
  • Improved arrhythmia-free survival with an odds ratio of 1.27.
  • Lowered the risk of phrenic nerve palsy with an odds ratio of 0.17 compared to CBA.

Cite This Study

Khawar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69449a892f0218eca95083edhttps://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i4.115195
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share