Simulation assesses CO2 reduction and performance metrics of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, indicating effective setups.
This paper examines the performance and potential of CO2 reduction of different configurations of electric vehicle charging infrastructure within a university commuter model, incorporating a simulated population and a discrete event simulation model. A commuter population dataset is created from ZIP code-based population assignment, distance-band approach, and personalized driving pattern models. Various charging infrastructure setups involving level 2 charging and level 3 charging were simulated for 30-day periods, with performance metrics such as wait-time, peak demand, use factor, and infrastructure cost appropriately evaluated. It is seen that performance characteristics significantly enhance beyond a base infrastructure level of 45 level 2 charging stations, with wait times diminishing close to zero levels for most level 3 charging setups. A WCDM decision makers strategy shows the charging setups of (L2=5, L3=0), and (L2=6, L3=0) charging setups being most cost-effective charging options with charging setups involving one level 3 charging station being viable options with excellent performance matrices. Results from CO2 emission calculations reveal net emission a decent reduction potential every month with an eventual shift from internal-combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles among the simulated commuter population dataset pool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yulong He (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: