Retrospective study demonstrates improved diagnostic performance using multi-parametric dual energy CT radiomics model for laryngeal lesions, highlighting strong discrimination and calibration.
Objectives To evaluate a multi-parametric dual energy CT (DECT) radiomics model combined with clinical factors and DECT findings for differentiating between laryngeal benign and malignant lesions. Methods For this retrospective study, the radiomic models were constructed based on a whole cohort of 282 patients underwent DECT examination. The radiomics signature was selected based on reproducible features by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method, and highly related radiomic, clinical features and DECT findings were selected to establish the radiomics-clinical model by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Nomogram performance was evaluated by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical use. Results Compared with the single-parametric DECT radiomic models, the multi-parametric model can improve the diagnostic efficacy for differentiating laryngeal benign from malignant lesions, with AUCs of 0.938 in training set and 0.920 in test set, respectively. Moreover, multi-parametric DECT based radiomics-clinical model incorporates the radiomics signature and DECT-reported lesion size showed the best diagnostic performance (AUC of 0.945) in the whole cohort, when compared with the radiomics model (AUC of 0.933, P < 0.05) and clinical model (AUC of 0.855, P < 0.05). Conclusions The multi-parametric DECT based radiomics-clinical model can serve as an important modality for noninvasively differentiating laryngeal benign lesions from malignant ones. Advances in knowledge This study highlight the value of DECT based radiomics model for differentiating laryngeal benign from malignant lesions. Moreover, the combination of radiomic, clinical features and DECT findings demonstrated good performance for differential diagnosing in laryngeal lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: