Analysis reveals instructors adopted stricter grading practices during COVID, suggesting stable student engagement despite policy flexibility.
This study examines faculty grading styles and student effort during the implementation of student-friendly grading policies amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Building on Millet’s (2018) methodology to quantify grading reliability and leniency, we use institutional data that distinguish between instructor-assigned grades and final posted grades affected by pandemic-era policies. Our analysis reveals that many instructors adopted stricter grading practices during this period. In contrast, there is no evidence that students adjusted their classroom effort strategically in response to the more flexible grading options. These findings suggest that grading behavior shifted, while student engagement remained relatively stable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calkins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: