Evaluation of treatment effects on bacterial burden in mice reveals CFU better predicts relapse than 16S rRNA.
The standard pharmacodynamic marker in murine tuberculosis drug studies is colony forming units (CFU). A faster PCR-based marker of bacterial burden is 16S rRNA. For unclear reasons, treatment reduces CFU more than 16S rRNA. We evaluated this CFU-16S gap and estimated the fraction potentially attributable to slow decay of 16S rRNA from dead Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) versus transition to a viable but not culturable on solid agar (VBNCSA) population. We quantified the CFU-16S gap during and following treatment in six BALB/c mouse studies and one in vitro study. Applying a two-population ordinary differential equation-based model of Mtb death and 16S rRNA decay, we estimated the fraction of the gap potentially attributable to dead Mtb. Using meta-regression, we estimated the association between CFU or 16S rRNA with relapse. For all regimens, CFU fell more than 16S rRNA, ranging from isoniazid-rifampin-pyrazinamide-ethambutol (CFU decreased 39-times more than 16S rRNA at week 4) to bedaquiline-pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide (CFU decreased >500,000-times more). The two-population model suggested that the fraction of the CFU-16S gap attributable to residual 16S rRNA from dead Mtb is modest and decreases over time. After treatment, 16S rRNA often fell while CFU rose. Four-week CFU change explained most variation in relapse (R 2 =0.90) while four-week 16S rRNA change did not (R 2 =0.24). CFU-16S gap is only partially explained by slow decay of residual 16S, suggesting development of a VBNCSA population. However, continued decrease in 16S rRNA after treatment cessation and its limited association with relapse suggests VBNCSA may be a transient rather than persistent state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabor et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: