In-depth profiling reveals immunomodulatory effects of efgartigimod on monocytes and Th17.1 cells in Myasthenia Gravis patients.
Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by antibody‐mediated complement activation. Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonist, is approved for treating generalized MG (gMG). However, its modulatory effects on upstream innate and adaptive immune cells remain largely unexplored. Methods We first quantified FcRn expression in peripheral immune subsets from acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR‐Ab) positive gMG. Then we assessed efgartigimod's impact on immune cells via in‐depth profiling in vitro and later validated these findings in a prospective real‐world cohort treated with efgartigimod. Results High FcRn expression was abundantly expressed on monocytes and lymphocytes in an exploratory MG cohort ( n = 29), with notable intracellular presence. In vitro studies showed efgartigimod significantly decreased intracellular FcRn in monocytes ( p < 0.001) and lymphocytes ( p = 0.019). After efgartigimod treatment, non‐classical monocytes (CD14 low CD16 + , 17.89 ± 9.60 vs. 14.58 ± 9.89 cells/μl, p < 0.001; 3.20 ± 2.06 vs. 2.61% ± 2.12%, p < 0.001) and Th17.1 cells (CXCR3 + CCR6 + , 95.83 ± 66.56 vs. 84.06 ± 61.70 cells/μl, p = 0.010; 10.42 ± 4.82 vs. 9.06% ± 4.46%, p = 0.000) were significantly downregulated. In contrast, antibody‐producing B cells and effector‐memory CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were expanded. Longitudinal assessments in the gMG cohort displayed similar findings, which likely reflect the direct inhibitory effect of efgartigimod on monocytes, coupled with negative feedback due to decreased IgG levels. Conclusions By integrating in vitro and clinical findings, we demonstrate that efgartigimod modulates peripheral immune cell populations, highlighting its significant immunomodulatory effects and clinical potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: