This analysis demonstrates the equivalence of value functions in zero-sum games with stochastic control, suggesting new frameworks for intervention costs.
We consider a finite-horizon, zero-sum game in which both players control a stochastic differential equation by invoking impulses. We derive a control randomization formulation of the game and use the existence of a value for the randomized game to show that the upper and lower value functions of the original game coincide. The main contribution of the present work is that we can allow intervention costs that are functions of the state as well as time, and that we do not need to impose any monotonicity assumptions on the involved coefficients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnus Perninge (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: