Background: Apelin-36 may be used to identify patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are at risk for the no-reflow phenomenon. Patients presenting with STEMI were evaluated and stratified according to their apelin-36 levels. Methods: In this study, 161 patients presenting with STEMI within 12 hours of symptom onset and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were enrolled. Biochemical parameters, including apelin-36, troponin T, creatine kinase (CK), the MB fraction of creatine kinase (CK-MB), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and other routine laboratory parameters, were measured. Blood samples for apelin-36 measurement were collected prior to PCI, centrifuged to obtain serum, and preserved at -80⁰C until being assayed. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed in all patients. Thereafter, patients were divided into two groups according to their level of Apelin-36. Results: Among the 161 consecutive STEMI patients, 115 (71.42%) had Apelin-36 levels ≤0.58ng/mL (group 1), whereas 46 (28.57%) had Apelin-36 levels 0.58ng/mL (group 2). In total, 51 (31.67%) STEMI patients experienced no-reflow phenomenon after PCI: 29 (18.01%) patients with apelin-36 ≤ 0.58ng/mL and 22 (13.66%) with a value 0.58ng/mL (p 0.001). In terms of Gensini score, the mean value in group 1 was (70.29 (±28.76), while in group 2, it was 81.95 (±23.82) (p=0.004). Overall, a positive correlation between apelin-36 and Gensini score was observed in both groups using Kendall’s correlation analysis (group 1: Figure 2, p=0.05; group 2: Figure 2, p0.0001). Binary logistic regression analysis identified apelin-36 and diabetes mellitus as significant predictors at the 5% level, with p-values of 0.045 and 0.036, respectively. Patients with apelin-36 levels ≤ 0.58ng/mL had troponin T levels of 290.0 (8.5-9510.0), while those with a value 0.58ng/mL had troponin T levels of 132.15 (9.4-5190.0) (p 0.012). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of apelin-36 was used to plot the true positive rate against the false positive rate at different cut-off points, with AUC=0.67 (95% CI, 0.57-0.76), and the cut-off value for apelin-36 was 0.58ng/mL, with p=0.001. Conclusions: Significant associations were observed between apelin-36 and no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI. An apelin-36 cut-off value of 0.58ng/mL, measured at admission, could be used to identify patients who were at increased risk of no-reflow phenomenon/reperfusion injury.
Krasniqi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.