This study critically examines the productivity dynamics within Ghana’s public sector, focusing on the factors influencing worker efficiency, institutional performance, and service delivery. Employing a qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design, data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions, institutional audits, and document reviews across five key ministries. The research is grounded in constructivist and public value management theories, offering a nuanced exploration of systemic, organizational, and behavioural contributors to low productivity. The study identified leadership quality, lack of accountability, rigid bureaucratic structures, digital inefficiencies, and weak motivation as central impediments to productivity. Findings revealed that while many public servants demonstrate capacity and commitment, the institutional environment often stifles initiative and rewards compliance over innovation. A significant gap was also observed between staff perceptions and citizen experiences, highlighting the need for robust feedback mechanisms. Comparative analysis with international best practices from Rwanda, Singapore, and South Korea illuminated potential pathways for reform, emphasizing the importance of performance contracts, digital integration, and continuous professional development. The study offers pragmatic recommendations including the institutionalization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), leadership reform, investment in digital infrastructure, and the adoption of non-monetary incentive schemes. This research contributes to public administration literature by contextualizing productivity within the Ghanaian public service and bridging theoretical constructs with actionable policy insights. It emphasizes that enhancing productivity is not solely a technical endeavour but one that requires political will, cultural change, and systemic transformation. By reimagining public sector work as a vehicle for public value rather than mere compliance, Ghana can make meaningful strides towards a more responsive, efficient, and citizen-centric administration.
Brenda Myers (Wed,) studied this question.