Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect and provide empirical evidence for hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta-epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical outcomes. In this guideline, we adapt items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to fit the context of meta-epidemiological studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. Hassan Murad
Mayo Clinic
Zhen Wang
Preventive Cardiology
Evidence-Based Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Murad et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69531e2e1dfba461e51d4bb2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: