Objective By adopting the shared decision-making (SDM) model, this study aims to improve treatment adherence and patients’ subjective initiative. It intends to systematically explore the barriers and facilitating conditions for patients who had a stroke to participate in rehabilitation SDM through the analysis and integration of qualitative research methods. The ultimate goal is to provide a basis for optimising the formulation of rehabilitation plans, enhancing the quality of nursing services and improving patients’ medical experience. Methods The following databases were searched, with only literatures published in English or Chinese included: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) and Wanfang Database. The search covered the period from the establishment of each database to 1 March 2025. The quality of the included literatures was evaluated using the Qualitative Research Quality Assessment Tool provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute in 2016, with a focus on factors affecting participation of patients who had a stroke in rehabilitation SDM. Results A total of 1502 articles were retrieved in the preliminary search, and 10 were finally included. From these included literatures, 31 findings were extracted. Similar results were categorised and grouped into 10 new categories, which were further integrated into 3 core integrated findings: (1) patient-related factors, including interference from negative emotions, the gap between rehabilitation expectations and reality, the impact of socio-demographic factors and self-efficacy with stage-specific autonomous needs; (2) family-related factors, including family support, the impact of patients’ sense of responsibility to their families on decision choices and trade-offs forced by economic burden; (3) healthcare provider and environmental factors, including paternalistic models undermining autonomy, insufficient information and difficulty in screening hindering decision-making and discontinuity in the rehabilitation system and lack of resources increasing decision-making burden. Conclusion Through the meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, this research shows that negative emotions and realistic gaps reduce patients’ participation in decision-making. While family support helps enhance patients’ confidence in decision-making, economic burden affects their decision choices. Additionally, one-way doctor–patient communication, insufficient information support and discontinuity in the rehabilitation service system increase patients’ decision-making burden.
Zang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: