Background Rotator cuff tears, a common cause of shoulder pain, often require surgery when conservative treatment fails. Arthroscopic repair is standard, though re-tear rates remain high. Objective This study aimed to identify the shoulder function questionnaires and strength tests that are significant factors for determining the necessity of rotator cuff repair and to build an effective machine learning model. Methods This study included 183 patients between January 2008 and December 2016. Among them, 89 patients underwent non-surgical treatment for rotator cuff injuries, whereas 94 underwent arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Fifteen features were analyzed in this study. Six machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, neural network, and support vector machine, were trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Results The final machine learning model was evaluated in an independent test set (n = 36). The neural network model demonstrated the highest performance (accuracy: 0.824, F1: 0.749). The top six predictive factors for rotator cuff repair were age, Constant–Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California-Los Angeles scale score, body mass index, and shoulder abductor strength deficit. Conclusions The probability of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was lower in individuals with a lower abductor strength deficit, higher shoulder questionnaire scores, younger age, and lower body mass index. When patients or clinicians are deciding on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, shoulder function questionnaires and differences in shoulder abductor strength should be considered. The clinical relevance is that the use of a preoperative shoulder questionnaire alongside objective abductor strength measurements offers practical guidance for shared decision-making on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Kim et al. (Mon,) studied this question.