Road safety ranks among the most apparent concerns in present-day urban existence, with risky driving the most prevalent cause of road crashes. In this paper, we present an external camera video-based automatic hazardous driving behavior detection model for use in smart cities. We addressed the problem with a holistic approach covering data collection to hazardous driving behavior classification including zig-zag driving, risky overtaking, and speeding over a pedestrian crossing. Our strategy employs a specially generated dataset with diverse driving situations under diverse traffic conditions and luminosities. We advocate for a Multi-Speed Transformer model with dual vehicle trajectory data timescale operation to capture near-future actions in the context of extended driving trends. A new contribution lies in our symbiotic system which, apart from the detection of unsafe driving, also assumes the responsibility of triggering countermeasures through a real-time continuous loop with vehicle systems. Empirical results demonstrate the Multi-Speed Transformer’s performance with 97.5% in accuracy and 93% in F1-score over our balanced corpus, surpassing comparison baselines including Temporal Convolutional Networks and Random Forest classifiers by significant amounts. The performance is boosted to 98.7% in accuracy as well as 95.5% in F1-score with the symbiotic framework. They confirm the promise of leading-edge neural architectures paired with symbiotic systems in enhancing road safety in smart cities. The ability of the system to provide real-time risky driving behavior detection with mitigation offers a real-world solution for the prevention of accidents while not restricting driver autonomy, a balance between automatic intervention, and passive monitoring. Empirical evidence on the TRAF-derived corpus, which includes 18 videos and 414 labelled trajectory segments, indicates that the Multi-Speed Transformer reaches an accuracy of 97.5% and an F1-score of 93% under the balanced-training protocol, and in this configuration it consistently surpasses the considered baselines when we use the same data splits and the same evaluation metrics.
Dentamaro et al. (Sun,) studied this question.