Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Profile analysis reveals perfectionism mediates eating disorder symptoms in women, indicating targets for treatment.
Background: This study examined the interplay between sociocultural internalization, perfectionism, and eating disorder (ED) symptoms. We pursued two complementary aims: (1) to identify latent profiles of women based on adaptive/maladaptive perfectionism and sociocultural internalization, and (2) to test perfectionism as a mediator between sociocultural internalization and ED symptoms. Methods: Participants comprised 203 Polish women aged 18–35 years (M = 25.1, SD = 3.5). Measures included the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), the Polish Adaptive and Maladaptive Perfectionism Questionnaire (KPAD), and the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups, followed by Kruskal–Wallis tests for between-profile comparisons. Mediation models were tested using the PROCESS macro (Model 4). Results: A three-profile solution provided the best fit (Entropy = 0.94). Profile 3 (high internalization and both perfectionism types; n = 58) reported the highest ED severity (EAT-26 total: M = 25.6, SD = 7.4), particularly in Dieting and Bulimia subscales. Profile 1 (low internalization, low maladaptive perfectionism; n = 64) showed the lowest scores (M = 12.3, SD = 5.2). No significant differences were found for the Oral Control subscale (H(2) = 2.53, p = 0.283). Mediation analyses indicated that maladaptive perfectionism significantly mediated associations between sociocultural internalization and ED symptoms (indirect effects b = 0.13–0.32, 95% CI excluding zero). Adaptive perfectionism was not a significant mediator. Conclusions: Results underscore maladaptive perfectionism as a key mechanism through which sociocultural pressures contribute to eating pathology. Implications include targeting internalization and perfectionistic concerns in prevention and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szymajda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: