Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals Inchbald's stammer affected audience reception in her plays, suggesting a new view of dysfluency as a creative tool.
This article explores how Elizabeth Inchbald’s lifelong stammer shaped her work as an actress and playwright in late eighteenth-century Britain. Though she achieved fame despite personal and financial challenges, her most persistent obstacle was her speech impediment, which was most visible during performances. Through close readings of I’ll Tell You What (1785) and Lovers’ Vows (1798), this article introduces the concept of a modality of dysfluency, which includes diagnosable, momentary, and structural dysfluency. This framework highlights how Inchbald used dysfluency not only as a thematic and structural tool but also as a way to manage audience reception. While she made stammering entertaining, her work reveals a complex relationship with the dysfluency that shaped her worldview.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Myles Hesse (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: