High-speed train derailments can cause severe vehicle collisions with rail bridges and adjacent infrastructure; however, full-scale evidence for the collision response of trackside intrusion-protection walls and for material measures that limit concrete fragmentation remains scarce. This study addresses this safety-driven knowledge gap by reporting a full-scale collision test of a polyurea-coated reinforced concrete (RC) wall and by clarifying its governing response mechanisms and coating benefits. The inverted T-shaped RC wall was post-anchored to an existing deck and spray-coated with approximately 5 mm polyurea on the collision face and across the wall-footing junction. A 17.68 t container wagon was propelled to 34.59 km/h to reproduce the normal kinetic energy of a representative 68 t KTX car derailing at 300 km/h with a 3° collision angle. High-speed video tracking and post-test mapping captured displacements, rotations, and damage. The wall contained the container wagon without climb-over and without severe local crushing at the collision face; the response was dominated by stable wall-footing rocking, with a peak top displacement of 0.571 m, peak rotation of 19.9°, and residual inclination of approximately 15–17°. The peak collision-force estimate was approximately 1.17 MN, and most input energy (approximately 647–816 kJ) was dissipated through inelastic rocking and sliding while the anchors remained intact. The polyurea layer restrained spalling and fragment release and promoted a more global, repairable rocking-dominated damage state. These results provide rare full-scale benchmarks and mechanistic insight to support performance-based design and retrofit of derailment intrusion-protection walls for improved rail-bridge safety.
Nguyễn et al. (Sun,) studied this question.