The subject of the study is a system of adaptation tools for the transformation of the economy of agricultural enterprises in the context of the implementation of European integration standards and digital technologies. The purpose of the study is the scientific substantiation and conceptualization of effective tools for adapting agricultural enterprises to the conditions of European integration and digital transformation, aimed at increasing their economic sustainability, innovation and competitiveness.Research methods – a systemic and structural–functional approach, methods of comparative analysis, institutional modeling, SWOT analysis, content analysis of the regulatory framework of the EU and Ukraine, as well as expert assessment of the level of digital readiness of agricultural enterprises were applied.Results of the work. A generalized typology of adaptation tools for the transformation of the agrarian economy has been developed, barriers to digital transformation have been analyzed, mechanisms of the influence of the European integration course on the management practices of agricultural enterprises have been characterized, a structural model of digital inclusion of the agricultural sector in the context of sustainable development has been proposed.Field of application of the results. The results can be used by agricultural enterprises, producer associations, advisory services, local communities, state structures and donors of programs to support the digital and European integration transformation of agriculture.Conclusions. The transformation of the economy of agricultural enterprises in modern conditions of European integration and digitalization requires a systemic, interdisciplinary and coordinated approach. Creating a flexible adaptation model based on a combination of digital, financial, institutional and personnel tools allows ensuring strategic stability and opens up new opportunities for integration into the common European space of sustainable agricultural production.
Hnatenko et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: