Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation reveals that particle size affects dust dispersion in tunnels, suggesting new strategies for improving air quality.
Drill-and-blast tunnel construction continuously releases high-intensity dust during drilling, blasting, and shotcreting, while conventional forced ventilation is often insufficient to control dust migration and worker exposure. This study develops three-dimensional Euler–Lagrange gas–solid two-phase models for these three typical processes to clarify the spatiotemporal dispersion of polydisperse dust and to explore effective control strategies. The simulations show that all processes generate a persistent high-concentration dust belt near the tunnel face, and a low-velocity recirculation zone at the crown acts as a structural hotspot of dust accumulation that is difficult to purge by longitudinal ventilation. Particle size strongly affects dispersion behaviour: coarse particles rapidly settle near the source under gravity, whereas fine and medium-sized particles remain suspended for long periods and can be transported over long distances, particularly after blasting. Based on these findings, a rail-mounted purification system with a dynamically adjustable position along the tunnel is proposed, and its preferred deployment zones are determined to work synergistically with the main airflow. The system is designed to perform near-source and crown-targeted removal, providing an engineering-oriented “dynamic local purification plus overall ventilation dilution” pathway for improving air quality in drill-and-blast tunnel construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: