Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed methods research revealed psychological distress differs in collegiate athletes across cultures, suggesting tailored interventions are needed.
Research on collegiate athlete mental health is overwhelmingly Western-centric, leaving a critical gap in understanding how cultural context shapes athletes’ experiences. This study addresses this gap through a cross-national comparison of the United States and South Korea. This convergent mixed-methods study integrated survey data from 400 athletes and in-depth interviews with 33 athletes, guided by the Social Ecological Model for Health Promotion. Quantitative results revealed that U.S. athletes reported significantly higher psychological distress ( F [1, 395] = 4.99, p < .01), while social and institutional support were key predictors of mental health outcomes in both contexts ( β s = –.18 to .27, ps < .001), with notable gendered variations. Integrating these findings with our qualitative analysis exposes two key phenomena: a “paradox of expression,” where higher reported distress in the U.S. likely reflects a cultural permission to disclose, and a “willingness-action gap,” where multi-level barriers prevent help-seeking. We argue these phenomena are shaped by distinct cultural ideologies: an individualistic culture of intense self-reliance and performance pressure in the U.S. and a collectivist culture of social harmony in South Korea. Ultimately, this study challenges a simplistic “better versus worse” narrative, concluding that both systems create distinct but different cultural and structural barriers to athlete mental health, demanding systemic and culturally-tailored interventions in both contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: