⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

July 21, 2009BMJOpen Access

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher A. Liberati Jennifer Tetzlaff Douglas G. Altman

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Moher et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695faa7f7ee72737d7f843c0 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothNotes and Queries · 2017
2Assessment and management of vulval painBMJ · 2012
3Hard data, soft dataBMJ · 2012
4Risk factors for mortality from imported falciparum malaria in the United Kingdom over 20 years: an observational studyBMJ · 2012
5Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ · 2012

Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trialBMJ · 2012
How the Taliban undermined community healthcare in Swat, PakistanBMJ · 2012
Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United StatesBMJ · 2012
Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic reviewBMJ · 2012
Association between low functional health literacy and mortality in older adults: longitudinal cohort studyBMJ · 2012

More from BMJ